In a study involving mothers in prison and toys for children, what must the IRB assess about the toys given to the children?

Disable ads (and more) with a membership for a one time $4.99 payment

Prepare for the CITI Social and Behavioral Research Exam with comprehensive quizzes, interactive questions, and guided explanations to ensure you pass with ease!

In studies involving vulnerable populations, such as mothers in prison, the Institutional Review Board (IRB) has a critical responsibility to ensure that participants are not exploited or unduly influenced by incentives provided as part of the research. When it comes to the toys given to the children, the focus is on preventing any undue inducement that could coerce participation or impact the mothers' decisions regarding their involvement in the study.

The consideration that the toys must not be an excessive incentive is particularly important because a strong incentive could lead to questions about the voluntariness of participation. The IRB aims to protect participants by ensuring that any incentives offered do not compromise informed consent or exploit individuals in sensitive situations, such as those faced by incarcerated mothers.

While educational value, age-appropriateness, and quality of toys are important factors in research design and in serving the children's best interests, the specific concern of avoiding excessive incentives directly relates to the ethical considerations of coercion and manipulation within the context of the mothers' participation in the study.